Senate champers
By Omololu Ogunmade and Senator Iroegbu in Abuja
High wire politics and intrigues surrounding the screening and
confirmation of ministerial nominees assumed a new dimension yesterday
when the Senate decided to postpone the entire exercise, as well as its
plenary.
Although no reason was given for the postponement, sources said it was
as a result of the resumption of Senate President Bukola Saraki’s trial
at the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) today.
According to the acting Clerk of the Senate, Nelson Ayewoh, plenary will resume tomorrow.
With the postponement of plenary and ministerial screening, Deputy
Senate President Ike Ekweremadu, who under normal circumstances should
have presided today, has also been prevented from doing so.
It is believed that the decision not to allow Ekweremadu to preside
since he became Saraki’s deputy is a fallout of the controversy which
trailed his emergence as Saraki’s deputy from the Peoples Democratic
Party (PDP), as well as the anger it caused among members of the All
Progressives Congress (APC).
A senator, who preferred not to be named, also explained that the
reason for keeping Ekweremadu out in the cold, albeit temporarily, was a
strategic one in order to prevent him from presiding over the Senate
today when the screening of the former Rivers State Governor Chibuike
Amaechi, should have come up.
He said since the PDP caucus of the Senate yesterday unanimously
resolved to oppose Amaechi’s screening and confirmation, allowing
Ekweremadu to preside today would amount to “leading a lamb, in this
case Amaechi, to the slaughter”, as the PDP senators would have their
way by not confirming his nomination.
Saraki is facing a 13-count charge for false declaration of assets
preferred against him by the Code of Conduction Bureau (CCB).
His trial remains on course, as both the Federal High Court and Federal
Court of Appeal deferred adjudication on the suits filed by Saraki
challenging the jurisdiction of CCT on the matter.
The Senate president had through his counsel prayed the Court of Appeal
for an order halting his trial by the tribunal pending the hearing and
determination of his motion on notice before the appellate court.
But the appellate court, against expectations on Monday, postponed ruling on the case indefinitely.
The court, which had earlier granted accelerated hearing to the
appellant, and fixed October 19 for definite ruling on the case, failed
to offer an explanation for the postponement but said it would
communicate a new date to the parties to the suit.
In the same vein, the presiding judge handling the case at the Federal
High Court, Justice Ahmed Mohammed, two weeks ago remitted the case to
the chief judge for re-assignment, citing media pressure.
The Dalandi Umar-led tribunal, in which Saraki was arraigned on
September 22, fixed continuation of his trial for October 21, 22 and 23
for the federal government to prove the charges brought against him.
But Saraki on the day pleaded not guilty to the 13-count charge,
maintaining that he was being prosecuted at the tribunal because he was
the Senate President.
He also faulted the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB) over its failure to
first invite him to draw his attention to the discrepancies, if any, to
his asset declaration forms for clarification as demanded by law.
However, concerns are mounting over the Court of Appeal’s unexplained
decision to defer the ruling on Saraki’s suit indefinitely.
Another senator, who spoke on the issue, warned that the judges of the
Court of Appeal were essentially dragging the judiciary into the
political fray, adding that it was a throwback to the impunity that
prevailed in the PDP era.
The senator, who is also a lawyer, pointed out that it was worrisome
that the Court of Appeal had set a date for ruling on Saraki’s case
challenging the jurisdiction of the CCT, “yet it postponed ruling
without an explanation”.
“It shows that there were external factors that informed the judges'
decision to postpone indefinitely and this is a dent on the so-called
war against corruption and the change mantra of the Muhammadu Buhari
administration and the All Progressives Congress (APC),” he added.
Meanwhile, the uncertainty over Amaechi's ministerial nomination
continued in the Senate yesterday, when the PDP caucus of the upper
chamber rose from its meeting vowing to resist the former Rivers
governor’s screening and confirmation.
Accordingly, THISDAY learnt that the senators resolved to endorse the
report of the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public
Petitions said to have recommended that the screening of Amaechi should
not be considered since doing so would be sub-judice.
A source told THISDAY that the PDP senators were vehement in their
resolve to ensure that the report is not discarded but should serve as
the basis for the suspension of the screening of the former governor in
accordance with Order 53(5) of the Senate Standing Orders. The order
prohibits the consideration of any matter that is before a law court if
in the opinion of the president of the senate taking such a matter will
be sub-judice.
Amaechi had told the committee while appearing before it last week that
the matter contained in the petition against his screening by The
Integrity Group was already sub-judice, thus forcing the committee to
announce its withdrawal from its investigation.
THISDAY also learnt that the screening process might be prolonged, as
the repeat of last week’s exercise during which no fewer than 10
ministerial nominees were screened in one day, would not happen again.
Instead, the screening will now be done piecemeal, that is, only two or three nominees will be screened a day.
With the PDP senators’ resolution, Amaechi has succeeded in polarising
the Senate, as the APC senators had at their own caucus meeting on
Monday resolved to back his screening and confirmation.
Earlier yesterday, the initial order paper containing the business of
the day circulated by the Senate had listed Amaechi as the third on a
list of eight ministerial nominees scheduled for screening, but the
senators went into a closed-door session, following which the order
paper was withdrawn and replaced with another one which reduced the
number of those slated for screening to three.
Consequently, Amaechi’s name disappeared from the list while the three
names presented in the revised list were Adebayo Shittu (Oyo); Prof.
Omoleye Daramola (Ondo) and Khadijah Abba-Ibrahim. There was no official
reason from the senate for the sudden change.
An APC senator, who did not want to be named, however told THISDAY
yesterday that Amaechi’s screening was put off to avoid an uproar during
his screening among the senators.
According to him, since the APC had resolved to back him, there was an
appeal by the leadership of the Senate to the PDP caucus to appease
those who were strongly opposed to his screening.
The source added that this move led to the decision to screen only
three ministerial nominees yesterday so that the PDP senators would have
ample time to resolve among themselves how Amaechi’s screening would be
devoid of rancour today.
He explained: “The screening was put off today (yesterday) to enable
members of PDP caucus appease the hardliners among them to smoothen the
path for Amaechi’s screening.
“The truth is that whether anyone likes it or not, Amaechi will be
confirmed. We in the APC caucus have resolved to confirm Amaechi.”
With Amaechi’s fate still undecided, the Senate Committee on Ethics,
Privileges and Public Petitions again failed to submit its report on the
petition by The Integrity Group against his screening.
It was learnt that the presentation of the report yesterday was
considered unnecessary since Amaechi was not going to be screened, even
though he was in the National Assembly along with the other seven
nominees.
Nevertheless, confusion arose when Shittu and Abbah-Ibrahim were
eventually screened yesterday as slated in the revised order paper, but
Daramola was not screened.
The source explained that Daramola’s screening was suspended till today to enable PDP members hold their caucus meeting.
Shittu, during his screening, denied an allegation that he was indicted
in 2000 over his roles in a religious crisis. He said he was in Saudi
Arabia when a gazette purportedly indicting him was issued by the
government of Oyo State.
According to him, he was never invited by the Commission of Inquiry,
which investigated the crisis, adding that in law, no panel can indict
anyone who has not been invited to defend himself against an allegation.
He claimed that his purported indictment was not an indictment after
all, arguing that the gazette only advised him to refrain from
publishing inflammatory comments capable of fuelling a religious crisis
and further denied the allegation that he was a religious fanatic.
He also added that the government had thereafter pardoned those
indicted in the gazette, thus rendering his alleged indictment null and
void.
Also screened yesterday was Mrs. Abba-Ibrahim, a third-term member of
the House of Representatives, who is also the wife of a former governor
of Yobe State and three term senator, Bukar Abba-Ibrahim.
After introducing herself, in accordance with the Senate’s tradition, she was asked to bow and go.
Prior to the screening of the two ministerial nominees, the Senate yesterday received more petitions against other nominees.
The first was from Senator Achom Nneji (Imo North), who presented 10
petitions against the nomination of Professor Anthony Auwuka of Imo
State to the upper chamber.
Although details of the petitions were not available yesterday, Auwuka,
a former Vice-Chancellor of Imo State University, was alleged to have
run the institution with impunity.
Also. a group, known as Concerned Professors, who are against the
nomination of a former Vice-Chancellor of the University of Ibadan (UI)
and nominee from Osun State, Professor Isaac Adewole, submitted a
petition to office of the senate president.
Among others, the UI professors accused Adewole of mismanaging the
university’s funds and called for his investigation. They also accused
him of covering the alleged diversion of the institution’s money from
its bank account with the defunct Afribank, UI branch by his wife’s
cousin to a private bank account.
“In the spirit of the fight against corruption by the government, it is
appropriate to investigate the several matters of mismanagement and
diversion of public funds raised against Professor Adewole in the
aforementioned petition before he is considered for the position of
Minister of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
“The signal sent to the University of Ibadan community and indeed the
whole world by Professor Adewole’s nomination is that these acts of
corruption on the part of Professor Adewole do not matter to the
government,” the petitioners said.
The petitioners further alleged that as the Provost of the College of
Medicine, UI between 2002 and 2006, Adewole used his position to employ
his second wife as a lecturer in his department instead of employing a
more qualified candidate, Dr. Aihmaku, at the time.
Culled from Thisday