President
Muhammadu Buhari (C) presenting copies of the 2017 budget documents to
the National Assembly on Wednesday, December 14, 2016.
• Senate queries Fashola, Adeosun over N2b vote
• Reps raise team to tackle economic recession
There is the fear that a huge part of the funds borrowed to execute
the 2017 budget may end up in private pockets, as no less than 276
questionable items from 55 agencies still remain in the document.
The controversial items, estimated at nearly half of the $1billion
Eurobond proceeds, appear in the form of duplications, repetitions and
inexplicable headings in the 2017 budget.
The expected budget performance and national development will remain
elusive, while the country would have committed future generations into
debt that benefitted a few individuals who diverted the funds into their
private pockets. Moreover, the provisions appear to be a template that
is represented on a yearly basis, thereby paving the way for the
misappropriation of the scarce resources that could have been deployed
for other uses.
The Director-General of the Budget Office of the Federation, Ben
Akabueze, at the 2017 Civil Society Summit on the Federal Budget in
Abuja, had said such an anomaly could only be traced in the former
document presented, not the one currently being considered by the
National Assembly.
But there are indications that these questionable provisions remain
in the national fiscal document for 2017, especially in proposals by
Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) like Budget and National
Planning; Works, Power and Housing; State House Headquarters; Health;
Water Resources; and Transport leading the pack. Others are Hajj
Commission; Education; Economic and Financial Crimes Commission; and
Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation.
Nigeria is in recession, leading to a fall in living standards. The
citizens now live on the margins, which makes it imperative for all
borrowed money to count.
For Dr. Olalekan Obademi of the Faculty of Business Administration,
University of Lagos, this is another litmus test for the lawmakers to
examine all items and ask for the economic justification.
“Frivolities and duplications have been the hallmark of Nigeria’s
budget over the years, with no one to be held responsible. If this trend
continues in the current budget, there is no doubt that only a few will
smile, leaving the majority in failed expectations again,” he said.
Raising concern over the use of the borrowed money to implement the
budget, he said there was the need for government to come out clear on
its recoveries and the specific projects they would be used to execute.
Dr. Uzochukwu Amakom of the Institute for Development Studies,
University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus, said if the controversial items
were allowed to pass, there would not be a basis for the acclaimed
change.
“First, I have always been skeptical about borrowing, not that it is
bad, but the crowding out effect on private sector and mostly, the
implementation. This estimated figure is nearly half of the Eurobond
proceeds. As you may know, a budget like this is dead on arrival because
it has been the bane of development in this country,” he said.
To the Lead Director of the Centre for Social Justice, Eze Onyekpere,
at this period of great economic uncertainty, the federal budget, along
with other economic policy instruments, is supposed to provide a guide
out of the current economic quagmire.
“The budget estimates are not anchored on any discernible policy
plank. We still have a budget suffused with frivolities, inappropriate,
unclear and wasteful expenditure. Every Ministry, Department and Agency
(MDA) seems to be budgeting like business as usual. High-level policy
documents are not resonating through the budget estimates.
“The annual ritual of demanding computers and software, bloated
refreshment and meals, and purchase of vehicles is still the norm. Every
MDA wants a vote for annual budget expenses and administration after
provisions have been made for their personnel costs which should have
covered this demand,” he said.
Also, Fidelis Onyjegbu of Public Finance Management at CSJ lamented
the demand for new vehicles without an explanation of what happened to
the pool of existing vehicles. He described the situation as an
opportunity to fritter funds.
“To worsen matters, MDAs are breaking the public procurement rules by
demanding specific brands of foreign cars at a time the executive and
legislature are championing the ‘Buy-Made-in- Nigeria’ campaign. Top of
MDAs doing this is the Presidency/State House.”
Also, Dr. David Agu of the Institute for Development Studies,
University of Nigeria, queried the rationale for the allocation of more
than N1.33 trillion to the budget ministry.
“These leaders must explain in words and action, whose interest they
are serving- the few or the majority. It is startling to have N901.2
billion recurrent expenditure and N426.3 billion capital expenditure in a
ministry that is more of service offering, than project execution.
This demands a clear explanation to Nigerians.
“The budget needs to be reworked to focus on pro-poor priorities;
creating an enabling environment for improved production and service
delivery; reducing inequality and increasing national wealth. Nigerians
demand leadership by example from the executive, legislature and the
judiciary,” he said.
Meanwhile, the Senate has condemned what it described as double
budgeting and padding in the budget proposal of the Ministry of Works,
Power and Housing.At a budget defence session in the National Assembly
yesterday, the Senate Committee on Housing expressed shock that despite
the provision of N41.9 billion for the National Housing Programme in the
budget, another strange N2 billion was planted in the document for a
non-existing regional housing scheme.
When the committee subjected the Minister of Works, Power and
Housing, Babatunde Raji Fashola to a series of questions over the
strange provision, he disowned the N2 billion allegedly voted for
regional housing scheme by the Ministry of Finance out of the
N64.991billioin budgetary proposals for the housing sector this year.
Fashola told the committee that the Ministry of Finance put it into
the 2017 budgetary profile of the Ministry of Housing as its own
initiative.
“I do not know as much of it as you do because it is not our
initiative.” “I do not know as much of it as you do because it is not
our initiative,”
Fashola told the committee presided over by Barnabas Gemade (APC
Benue North East).Consequently, the committee ordered its clerk to write
the Minister of Finance, Kemi Adeosun to appear before it for an
explanation on the questionable vote.
Also yesterday, the House of Representatives Speaker, Yakubu Dogara
inaugurated a 12- member panel to begin engagements with relevant
agencies of government on possible ways of dealing with the recession in
the country.
The ad hoc committee headed by Olabode Ayorinde is to find out how the
nation slipped into the economic mess before recommending measures for
getting out of it.
Inaugurating the panel, known as Tactical Committee on Economic
Recession, Dogara said engagements with the executive were crucial at
this time, as the government was appearing helpless in the face of the
huge job losses, low economic activities and intense hardships being
experienced by Nigerians.
He said the decision of the House followed its resolve at its
inauguration in March 2015 to consistently collaborate with the
government in checking and balancing the executive.
Guardian